Greetings,
I am a doctoral student from Benedictine University, and would very much
like to attend this workshop. Please let me know the time, date, location,
and if I am able to attend. Thanks in advance for assistance and this
workshop,
Lach
On 11-05-02 2:16 PM, "jsbednar" <
jsbednar@UMICH.EDU> wrote:
>Are you a doctoral student (or do you have a doctoral student in your
>department) who is interested in learning the craft of reviewing or
>improving your reviewing skills? If so, the MOC Division is sponsoring
>³Reviewing in the Rough: A Professional Development Workshop for Doctoral
>Students² at this year¹s Academy of Management Annual Meeting in San
>Antonio, Texas (abstract below). Please note that pre-registration is
>required (contact the organizers at
mocreview@gmail.com to obtain the
>approval code) and registration is limited to 35 students. We look
>forward to seeing you in San Antonio!
>
>ABSTRACT
>
>Reviewing is a critical ³professional responsibility² and an integral
>part of participating in the academic community (Trevino, 2008). Yet
>Tsang and Frey (2007: 129) noted that ³there is no formal training for
>referees who usually pick up their review skills through learning by
>doing.² This raises a perplexing question for doctoral students: how can
>they develop critical reviewing skills when there are so few
>opportunities for students to practice the art of reviewing? This
>professional development workshop (PDW) provides students with a rare
>opportunity to learn and practice the art of reviewing. Prior to the
>conference, students will be asked to prepare a formal review of an
>original submission of Scott DeRue¹s manuscript ³The Impact of Feedback
>Frequency and Positive Affective State on Task Performance: Challenging
>the ³More is Better² Assumption.² (Lam, DeRue, Karam, & Hollenbeck, in
>press). The actual workshop will consist of two sessions: (1) a panel
>session and (2) an interactive session. The panel session will provide
>students an opportunity to gain key insights about quality reviewing from
>former Editors, Associate Editors, and Editorial Board Members (Martin
>Kilduff, Michael Pratt, Kyle Lewis, and Glen Kreiner). In the interactive
>session, students will break into small groups, facilitated by an
>experienced faculty member (Gayle Baugh, John Bingham, Brayden King, Ravi
>Madhavan, Suzanne Masterson, David Mayer, Ryan Quinn, Nancy Rothbard, or
>Eduardo Salas), to discuss and receive feedback on their formal reviews.
>Scott DeRue will then discuss the actual reviews of his original
>submission and how they helped shape the final manuscript.